The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced us many harsh classes. Importantly, it has proven us how simple it’s to fabricate panic and control entire populations through deceptive means. Topping the record of misleading methods is the usage of a check that falsely labels wholesome people as sick and infectious. This enables mass testing to drive the narrative that we’re in a deadly pandemic.
Of course, I am speaking in regards to the now notorious reverse transcription polymerase chain response (RT-PCR) check. The very fact is, the PCR check shouldn’t be designed to be used as a diagnostic software because it can’t distinguish between inactive viruses and “reside” or reproductive ones.1
It is a essential level, since inactive and reproductive viruses will not be interchangeable by way of infectivity. When you have a nonreproductive virus in your physique, you’ll not get sick and you can’t unfold it to others. Secondly, many if not most laboratories amplify the RNA collected far too many instances, which ends up in wholesome individuals testing “constructive.”
The Essential Element That Nullifies Most PCR Check Outcomes
The video above explains how the PCR check works and the way we’re deciphering outcomes incorrectly. In abstract, the PCR swab collects RNA out of your nasal cavity. This RNA is then reverse transcribed into DNA. As a consequence of its tiny dimension, it have to be amplified to develop into discernible. Every spherical of amplification is named a cycle, and the variety of amplification cycles utilized by any given check or lab is named a cycle threshold (CT).
The upper the CT, the higher the chance that insignificant sequences of viral DNA find yourself being magnified to the purpose that the check reads constructive even when your viral load is extraordinarily low or the virus is inactive and poses no menace to you or anybody else.
Many scientists have famous that something over 35 cycles is scientifically indefensible.2,3,4 A September 28, 2020, examine5 in Scientific Infectious Illnesses revealed that if you run a PCR check at a CT of 35 or increased, the accuracy drops to three%, leading to a 97% false constructive price.
But, a check generally known as the Corman-Drosten paper and checks really useful by the World Well being Group are set to 45 cycles,6,7,8 and the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration and the U.S. Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention advocate working PCR checks at a CT of 40.9
The query is why, contemplating the consensus is that CTs over 35 render the check ineffective. When labs use these extreme cycle thresholds, you clearly find yourself with a grossly overestimated variety of constructive checks, so what we’re actually coping with is a “casedemic”10,11 — an epidemic of false positives.
Many at the moment are questioning whether or not this was performed on function to crash the worldwide financial system and present cowl for the implementation of what is generally known as the Great Reset, which is nothing lower than a global totalitarian takeover by unelected technocrats who search to gobble up all of the world’s property.
Certainly, it appears fairly clear we’re not coping with a deadly pandemic in any actual sense. Mortality statistics additional show that is the case, as total mortality statistics have remained secure in 2020 and in step with earlier years.12,13,14
In different phrases, persons are dying from COVID-19, sure, however the sickness shouldn’t be killing an extra variety of individuals. The identical variety of individuals would have died anyway, from one thing. Certainly, CDC knowledge15 launched August 26, 2020, confirmed solely 6% of so-called COVID-19 deaths had COVID-19 listed as the only trigger on the loss of life certificates.
“For deaths with situations or causes as well as to COVID-19, on common, there have been 2.6 further situations or causes per loss of life,” the CDC acknowledged, and any a type of comorbidities may have killed these individuals even when COVID-19 was nonexistent.
For Accuracy, A lot Decrease CTs Should Be Used
Now, if CTs above 35 are scientifically unjustified, simply how low of a CT needs to be used? Fairly a few research have investigated this, so there is not any scarcity of information at this level. The truth that the WHO, FDA and CDC nonetheless haven’t modified their CTs downward in mild of all these knowledge tells us they don’t seem to be desirous about getting an correct image of the an infection price.
For instance, an April 2020 examine16 within the European Journal of Scientific Microbiology & Infectious Illnesses confirmed that to get 100% confirmed actual positives, the PCR check have to be run at 17 cycles. Above 17 cycles, accuracy drops dramatically.
By the time you get to 33 cycles, the accuracy price is a mere 20%, that means 80% are false positives. Past 34 cycles, your likelihood of a constructive PCR check being a true constructive shrinks to zero.
Extra just lately, a December 3, 2020, systematic evaluation17 printed within the journal of Scientific Infectious Illnesses assessed the findings of 29 totally different research — all of which have been printed in 2020 — evaluating proof of SARS-CoV-2 an infection with the CTs utilized in testing.
As reported by the authors, “12 research reported that CT values have been considerably decrease … in specimens producing reside virus tradition.” In different phrases, the upper the CT, the decrease the possibility of a constructive check truly being as a result of presence of reside (and infectious) virus.
“Two research reported the chances of reside virus tradition diminished by roughly 33% for each one unit enhance in CT,” the authors famous. Importantly, 5 of the research included have been unable to determine any reside viruses in circumstances the place a constructive PCR check had used a CT above 24. What’s extra, with a purpose to produce reside virus tradition, a affected person whose PCR check used a CT at or above 35 needed to be symptomatic.
So, to summarize, in case you have signs of COVID-19 and check constructive utilizing a PCR check that was run at 35 amplification cycles or increased, then you’re more likely to be contaminated and infectious.
Nonetheless, in case you shouldn’t have signs, but check constructive utilizing a PCR check run at 35 CTs or increased, then it’s possible a false constructive and also you pose no danger to others as you are unlikely to hold any reside virus. The truth is, supplied you are asymptomatic, you are unlikely to be infectious even in case you check constructive with a check run at 24 CTs or increased.
Fearmongering Success Hinges on Incorrect Use of PCR Check
The video above consists of a number of interviews with specialists who’ve overtly criticized the usage of PCR testing to diagnose infections akin to COVID-19. These embrace:
The inventor of the PCR check, the late Kary Mullis (he has spoken in regards to the check for different infections, akin to HIV, however died in August 2019, just a few months earlier than the COVID-19 pandemic broke out)
Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a former vice-president and chief scientific adviser of the drug firm Pfizer
Professor Carl Heneghan, director of the Oxford College Middle for Proof-Primarily based Drugs
Emeritus professor of immunology Beda M. Stadler, former head of the Bern Institute of Immunology
Clare Craig, a marketing consultant pathologist
Stephen A. Bustin, professor of molecular medication and a world-renowned professional on the PCR check
In 1993, Mullis spoke about the usage of the PCR check to diagnose HIV. He defined that every one the check does is amplify molecules into one thing you’ll be able to detect, but it surely can’t let you know whether or not these particles truly pose a danger to your well being.
He additionally factors out that, utilizing PCR, you’ll be able to basically discover absolutely anything in anybody as a result of most of us are strolling round with pathogens of all kinds, however the load is both too low to be of concern or the particles are simply lifeless particles that pose no danger.
Bustin factors out that if you get a constructive end result utilizing a CT of 35 or increased, you are trying on the equal of a single copy of viral DNA. The probability of that inflicting a well being drawback is minuscule. Even Dr. Anthony Fauci has admitted that utilizing a PCR check with a CT above 35 renders it kind of ineffective as a result of at that time, you are simply detecting lifeless nucelotides. No reside virus will be detected at CTs that top.
Deadly Errors Present in Paper on Which PCR Testing Is Primarily based
November 30, 2020, a group of twenty-two worldwide scientists printed a evaluation18 difficult the scientific paper19 on PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 written by Christian Drosten, Ph.D., and Victor Corman. The Corman-Drosten paper was rapidly accepted by the WHO and the workflow described therein was adopted as the usual internationally.
In accordance with Reiner Fuellmich,20 founding member of the German Corona Additional-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss,21 or ACU),22,23 Drosten is a key offender within the COVID-19 pandemic hoax.
The scientists demand the Corman-Drosten paper be retracted resulting from “deadly errors,”24 one among which is the truth that it was written (and the check itself developed) earlier than any viral isolate was out there. All they used was the genetic sequence printed on-line by Chinese language scientists in January 2020.
The truth that the paper was printed a mere 24 hours after it was submitted additionally suggests it did not even bear peer evaluation. In an Undercover DC interview, Kevin Corbett, Ph.D., one of many 22 scientists who at the moment are demanding the paper’s retraction, acknowledged:25
“Each scientific rationale for the event of that check has been completely destroyed by this paper. It is like Hiroshima/Nagasaki to the COVID check.
When Drosten developed the check, China hadn’t given them a viral isolate. They developed the check from a sequence in a gene financial institution. Do you see? China gave them a genetic sequence with no corresponding viral isolate. They’d a code, however no physique for the code. No viral morphology.
Within the fish market, it is like providing you with just a few bones and saying ‘that is your fish.’ It could possibly be any fish … Pay attention, the Corman-Drosten paper, there’s nothing from a affected person in it. It is all from gene banks. And the bits of the virus sequence that weren’t there they made up.
They synthetically created them to fill within the blanks. That is what genetics is; it is a code. So, its ABBBCCDDD and also you’re lacking some, what you assume is EEE, so you place it in … That is mainly a pc virus.
There are 10 deadly errors on this Drosten check paper … However right here is the underside line: There was no viral isolate to validate what they have been doing. The PCR merchandise of the amplification did not correspond to any viral isolate at the moment. I name it ‘donut ring science.’ There may be nothing on the heart of it. It is all about code, genetics, nothing to do with actuality …
There have since been papers saying they’ve produced viral isolates. However there aren’t any controls for them. The CDC produced a paper in July … the place they mentioned: ‘This is the viral isolate.’ Have you learnt what they did? They swabbed one particular person. One particular person, who’d been to China and had chilly signs. One particular person. And so they assumed he had [COVID-19] to start with. So, it is all stuffed with holes, the entire thing.“
The conclusion of the evaluation reads, partially:26
“A choice to acknowledge the errors obvious within the Corman-Drosten paper has the profit to significantly decrease human value and struggling going ahead. Is it not in the most effective curiosity of Eurosurveillance to retract this paper? Our conclusion is evident. Within the face of all of the large PCR-protocol design flaws and errors described right here, we conclude: There may be not a lot of a alternative left within the framework of scientific integrity and accountability.”
The critique towards PCR testing is additional strengthened by a November 20, 2020, examine27 in Nature Communications, which discovered no viable virus in PCR-positive circumstances at all. The examine evaluated knowledge from 9,865,404 residents of Wuhan, China, who had undergone PCR testing between Could 14 and June 1, 2020.
A complete of 300 examined constructive however had no signs. Of the 34,424 individuals with a historical past of COVID-19, 107 examined constructive a second time. But, once they did virus cultures on these 407 people who had examined constructive (both for the first or second time), no reside virus was present in any of them!
Antibody Exams Are Equally Unreliable
Antibody checks are additionally turning out to have their share of high quality issues. When you have antibodies towards SARS-CoV-2, that might be proof that your immune system efficiently overcame the virus sooner or later previously. Nonetheless, the COVID-19 antibody check may additionally prove constructive in case you have antibodies towards widespread chilly viruses.
June 30, 2020, the CDC admitted that prior publicity to coronaviruses liable for the widespread chilly can lead to a constructive COVID-19 antibody check, even in case you’ve by no means been uncovered to SARS-CoV-2 particularly.28
The saving grace is that research29,30,31 counsel antibodies produced following publicity to coronaviruses that trigger the widespread chilly additionally seem to supply some basic and long-lasting resistance towards SARS-CoV-2.
One such examine,32,33 printed Could 14, 2020, within the journal Cell, discovered 70% of samples from sufferers who had recovered from gentle circumstances of COVID-19 had resistance to SARS-CoV-2 on the T-cell stage, as did 40% to 60% of individuals who had not been uncovered to SARS-CoV-2.
In accordance with the authors, this means there’s “cross-reactive T cell recognition between circulating ‘widespread chilly’ coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2.” In different phrases, in case you’ve recovered from a standard chilly attributable to a selected coronavirus, your humoral immune system could activate if you encounter SARS-CoV-2, thus rendering you immune to COVID-19.
One other examine34 found SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies are solely present in probably the most extreme circumstances — about 1 in 5. So, a adverse antibody check does not essentially rule out the likelihood that you’ve got been contaminated and did not get sick. The truth is, this discovering suggests COVID-19 could truly be 5 instances extra prevalent than suspected — and 5 instances much less lethal than predicted.
In a letter to the editor35 printed within the July 1, 2020, problem of American Household Doctor, Drs. Mark Ebell, deputy editor for evidence-based medication for the journal, and Henry Barry, reviewed a number of the out there knowledge, noting that:
“When assessing whether or not sufferers had a earlier an infection and could also be immune, it is very important keep away from false-positives in order that sufferers don’t assume they’re immune when they don’t seem to be.
Desk 1 summarizes the false-positive charges at numerous inhabitants prevalence for the Cellex check and for a hypothetical check that’s 90% delicate and 99% particular. At comparatively low inhabitants prevalences, which possible replicate present situations in the US and elsewhere, we might argue that false-positive charges are unacceptably excessive with the Cellex check.”
Ebell and Barry identified that most of the antibody tests which have provisional approval from the FDA nonetheless haven’t even been evaluated for accuracy. Additionally they really useful that labs report check outcomes “in a means that displays the native inhabitants prevalence based mostly on widespread testing and embrace the false-positive price,” as this info “is required to assist household physicians higher inform shared decision-making concerning earlier an infection and return to work or college.”
At current, you’d be hard-pressed to seek out anybody together with that knowledge of their reporting, and the means issues are going, I would not maintain my breath in anticipation of such useful numbers being included sooner or later both.
Excessive Time to Finish Mass Testing Rip-off
If the huge majority of people that check constructive for COVID-19 an infection haven’t any signs, do not feel sick and do not look sick, is COVID-19 actually a “lethal” illness? Or, is it extra like HPV — a viral an infection that most individuals have with out understanding it, and which 90% are capable of get rid of with out remedy?
The first justification for the tyrannical governmental interventions of COVID-19 was to sluggish the unfold of the an infection in order that hospital sources wouldn’t be overwhelmed, inflicting individuals to die resulting from lack of medical care.
These interventions weren’t about stopping the unfold altogether and even lowering the variety of individuals that might finally get contaminated. They definitely have been by no means meant to forestall all loss of life. Any rational evaluation would quickly conclude that this merely is not attainable, beneath any circumstance.
Quick-term stay-at-home orders and enterprise closings have been solely meant to decelerate the unfold so that, finally, naturally-acquired herd immunity — the most effective type — would stop it from reemerging. But the objective posts preserve shifting as we go alongside.
Two-week lockdowns became months in some areas. Finally, we have been informed every thing would return to regular as quickly as a vaccine turned out there. However as soon as the vaccines began rolling out, the narrative modified once more, and we have been informed we might nonetheless want masks, social distancing and lockdowns nicely into 2021 and even 2022 even with a vaccine. What, precisely, is occurring?
The one rational purpose for why authorities interventions proceed is as a result of they’re meant to erode our private freedoms and civil liberties and switch wealth to unelected technocrats who’re controlling the pandemic narrative. It is all fearmongering based mostly on a mixture of wildly manipulated knowledge and flawed checks.
Apart from PCR testing knowledge, there is not any proof of a deadly pandemic in any respect. As talked about, whereas there’s such a factor as COVID-19, and folks have and do die from it, there aren’t any extra deaths resulting from it.36,37,38 The whole mortality for 2020 is regular.
So, except we assume we must always shut down the world and cease residing as a result of individuals die from coronary heart illness, diabetes, most cancers, the flu or the rest, then there is not any purpose to close down the world as a result of some individuals occur to die from COVID-19.
What You Can Do
The excellent news is the hoax is beginning to be uncovered. In November 2020, a Portuguese appeals court docket dominated39,40 that the PCR check is “not a dependable check for SARS-CoV-2” and that “a single constructive PCR check can’t be used as an efficient analysis of an infection.” Due to this fact, “any enforced quarantine based mostly on the outcomes is illegal.”41 The court docket additionally famous that forcing wholesome individuals to self-isolate could possibly be a violation of their basic proper to liberty.
As detailed in “Coronavirus Fraud Scandal — The Biggest Fight Has Just Begun” and “German Lawyers Initiate Class-Action Coronavirus Litigation,” further authorized circumstances are additionally to be anticipated, all of which is able to assist expose the fraud perpetrated. As for what you can do within the meantime, think about:
- Turning off mainstream media information and turning to unbiased specialists — do the analysis. Learn via the science.
- Proceed to counter the censorship by asking questions — arm your self with mortality statistics and the information on PCR testing, so you’ll be able to clarify how and why this pandemic merely is not a pandemic anymore.
- In case you are a medical skilled, particularly in case you’re a member of an expert society, write an open letter to your authorities, urging them to talk to and heed suggestions from unbiased specialists.
- Signal The Great Barrington Declaration,42 which requires an finish to lockdowns.
- Be part of a gaggle so that you simply can have assist — Examples of teams fashioned to struggle towards authorities overreach embrace Us for Them, a gaggle campaigning for reopening faculties and defending kids’s rights within the U.Okay., and the Freedom to Breathe Agency, a U.S. group of attorneys, docs, enterprise homeowners and oldsters who’re preventing to guard freedom and liberty.